Pima vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,013,106 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.701. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.135% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 134.6 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($63,262 compared to $91,541, a difference of 44.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $106,109, a difference of 44.6%), and per capita income ($30,644 compared to $43,539, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $55,714, a difference of 8.2%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $40,558, a difference of 14.8%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 124.2%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 115.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 102.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 2.9%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 42.3%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 57.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 149.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 129.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 118.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 73.3%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 69.6%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 2.3%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.36, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 64.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 14.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 58.7%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 51.0%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.64%), 10th grade (91.2% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 65.4%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 58.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 8.1%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 10.4%).