Turkish vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,935,526 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.065. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 20.8 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,391 compared to $43,539, a difference of 20.3%), median male earnings ($64,253 compared to $55,241, a difference of 16.3%), and median family income ($121,202 compared to $106,252, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $55,714, a difference of 2.7%), householder income over 65 years ($68,037 compared to $64,089, a difference of 6.2%), and median household income ($99,389 compared to $91,541, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.9%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 16.8%), and family poverty (7.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.6%), single female poverty (18.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.64%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.9%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.0%), and births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (47.8% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 41.3%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 35.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 25.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 62.0%), doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 55.0%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 11.0%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.58%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%).