Jordanian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,182,918 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.302. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.167% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to a decrease of 167.3 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 8.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $55,714, a difference of 7.6%), and median male earnings ($58,500 compared to $55,241, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($91,794 compared to $91,541, a difference of 0.28%), householder income over 65 years ($64,313 compared to $64,089, a difference of 0.35%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,186 compared to $100,283, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 12.2%), receiving food stamps (10.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.28%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and male poverty (10.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.56%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.0%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.020%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 25.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.020%), no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 46.9%), master's degree (16.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 18.2%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.94%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.95%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.42%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.6%).