Laotian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,609,311 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.399. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.577% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 577.0 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,041 compared to $43,539, a difference of 8.0%), median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $55,241, a difference of 7.4%), and wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $55,714, a difference of 2.5%), householder income over 65 years ($66,306 compared to $64,089, a difference of 3.5%), and median household income ($94,990 compared to $91,541, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 11.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 8.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.38%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and single mother poverty (27.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.76%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.21%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.050%), currently married (47.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.79%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.44%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 34.1%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 30.3%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 6.8%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.83%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.5%).