Houma vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,258,588 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.590. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.155% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to a decrease of 155.1 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 55.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $106,109, a difference of 47.2%), and median household income ($62,575 compared to $91,541, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $55,241, a difference of 9.3%), median earnings ($38,949 compared to $47,671, a difference of 22.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $55,714, a difference of 25.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 105.0%), single father poverty (26.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 86.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 81.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 32.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 36.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 66.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 51.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 53.3%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.9%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 2.1%), family households (65.7% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 67.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 43.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 33.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 82.0%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 79.5%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 76.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (94.2% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 76.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 75.0%), and vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 63.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 13.2%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 15.4%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.4%).