Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 318,495,136 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.384. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.101% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 100.9 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,722 compared to $100,283, a difference of 10.5%), per capita income ($39,403 compared to $43,539, a difference of 10.5%), and median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $55,241, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 0.31%), householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $64,089, a difference of 1.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $55,714, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 16.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), single father poverty (15.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.4%), births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.4% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 0.090%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.95%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.6%), no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.65%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 34.0%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 20.5%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.80%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 17.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 16.7%), and male disability (12.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.4%).