Mexican vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 501,491,143 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Mexican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.419. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexicans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexicans corresponds to a decrease of 17.9 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,559 compared to $43,539, a difference of 26.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,427 compared to $100,283, a difference of 24.7%), and median family income ($85,618 compared to $106,252, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 5.0%), householder income under 25 years ($49,989 compared to $55,714, a difference of 11.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,897 compared to $64,089, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 41.1%), family poverty (11.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 38.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 12.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 15.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 23.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.0%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.8% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.2% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 26.5%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.5%), and births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (69.0% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 2.2%), married-couple households (47.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.48 compared to 3.36, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 22.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.7% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 46.9%), professional degree (2.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 46.7%), and master's degree (9.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.40%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 17.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.2% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.7%), disability age over 75 (51.1% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.7%).