Ottawa vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,867,166 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Ottawa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.475. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ottawa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.218% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ottawa corresponds to a decrease of 218.2 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,984 compared to $91,541, a difference of 29.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,012 compared to $100,283, a difference of 26.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,953 compared to $106,109, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 8.8%), per capita income ($37,101 compared to $43,539, a difference of 17.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,366 compared to $55,714, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 36.8%), single female poverty (26.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 34.5%), and single mother poverty (35.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 37.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.0% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 20.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.5% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 20.1%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 15.9%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.2%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and married-couple households (45.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.1%), no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 16.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 78.2%), bachelor's degree (31.1% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 18.4%), and master's degree (11.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 49.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 38.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.3%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.7%).