Paraguayan vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,801,498 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Paraguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.099. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Paraguayans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.091% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Paraguayans corresponds to a decrease of 90.7 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,385 compared to $43,539, a difference of 15.7%), median male earnings ($59,975 compared to $55,241, a difference of 8.6%), and median family income ($114,016 compared to $106,252, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,614 compared to $55,714, a difference of 0.18%), householder income over 65 years ($64,443 compared to $64,089, a difference of 0.55%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,447 compared to $106,109, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 9.1%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.13%), single mother poverty (27.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and female poverty (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.4%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.24%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.45%), and births to unmarried women (29.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 66.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 66.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 6.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 18.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 39.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 45.3%), master's degree (18.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 34.7%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.80%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 72.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.7%).