Ghanaian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 188,865,786 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.120. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.062% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to an increase of 61.6 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,137 compared to $100,283, a difference of 11.3%), wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 11.0%), and median household income ($83,582 compared to $91,541, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,429 compared to $40,558, a difference of 0.32%), median earnings ($46,440 compared to $47,671, a difference of 2.6%), and per capita income ($42,164 compared to $43,539, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 25.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 24.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 8.3%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 16.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.86%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.6%), married-couple households (42.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 14.6%), and births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.43%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.36, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 91.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 56.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 9.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 24.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 41.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 13.2%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 11.2%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.18%), college, 1 year or more (58.4% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 16.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.77%), disability (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.8%).