Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,462
SOCIAL INDEX
62.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
152nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,286,448 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.349. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.179% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to a decrease of 178.8 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $43,539, a difference of 18.9%), median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $55,241, a difference of 12.6%), and wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $55,714, a difference of 2.5%), householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $64,089, a difference of 3.6%), and median household income ($95,319 compared to $91,541, a difference of 4.1%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $51,770 | Average $43,539 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,165 | Excellent $106,252 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,319 | Exceptional $91,541 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $52,361 | Excellent $47,671 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,217 | Good $55,241 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,571 | Excellent $40,558 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,352 | Exceptional $55,714 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $106,888 | Exceptional $100,283 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,914 | Exceptional $106,109 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,376 | Exceptional $64,089 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Exceptional 24.8% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 14.9%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.88%), single female poverty (19.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.0% | Excellent 11.7% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Excellent 8.5% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Excellent 10.6% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Excellent 12.7% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Excellent 15.2% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Single Fathers | Good 16.2% | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.4% | Exceptional 27.1% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Good 5.1% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Good 10.8% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Average 12.2% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Excellent 11.1% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.6%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.67%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
| Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.3% |
| Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Fair 5.4% |
| Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.4% |
| Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Average 11.6% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.8% | Exceptional 17.1% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Excellent 10.1% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Average 6.7% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Good 5.4% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Average 4.7% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Good 4.5% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Poor 4.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Excellent 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Good 5.1% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Excellent 8.5% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.70%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Exceptional 65.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.9% | Excellent 79.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Average 36.6% | Poor 35.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Average 75.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Poor 84.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Average 84.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Fair 84.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Average 82.8% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.5%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.3%), and family households with children (26.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.3%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.8%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
| Family Households | Tragic 63.4% | Exceptional 67.5% |
| Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 29.1% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.8% | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Exceptional 3.36 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Poor 2.4% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Average 6.3% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Good 47.1% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.4% | Excellent 30.4% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 42.3%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 37.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 25.0%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 8.6% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 91.4% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 59.6% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 23.1% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 59.0%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 44.3%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
| No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.9% |
| Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.1% |
| Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.1% |
| 1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.1% |
| 2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
| 3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.8% |
| 4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.5% |
| 5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.3% |
| 6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 95.9% |
| 7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 94.5% |
| 8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.2% |
| 9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Tragic 93.3% |
| 10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 92.1% |
| 11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Tragic 90.9% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 89.6% |
| High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Tragic 87.2% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.9% | Tragic 84.1% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.6% | Fair 64.5% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.1% | Fair 58.5% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.9% | Fair 45.2% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Fair 36.8% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.5% | Poor 14.0% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 4.0% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Poor 1.7% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 11.1%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
| Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Males | Excellent 10.9% | Excellent 10.9% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.0% | Average 23.3% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Tragic 48.7% |
| Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Excellent 2.1% |
| Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Good 3.0% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.2% | Excellent 17.0% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Poor 2.5% |