Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,462
SOCIAL INDEX
62.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
152nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,322,315 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.347. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.042% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 42.4 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($61,663 compared to $91,541, a difference of 48.4%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $106,252, a difference of 47.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($69,068 compared to $100,283, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 12.0%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $40,558, a difference of 22.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $55,714, a difference of 23.1%).
| Income Metric | Tohono O'odham | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
| Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,256 | Average $43,539 |
| Median Family Income | Tragic $72,193 | Excellent $106,252 |
| Median Household Income | Tragic $61,663 | Exceptional $91,541 |
| Median Earnings | Tragic $36,349 | Excellent $47,671 |
| Median Male Earnings | Tragic $39,543 | Good $55,241 |
| Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,205 | Excellent $40,558 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,248 | Exceptional $55,714 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $69,068 | Exceptional $100,283 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,774 | Exceptional $106,109 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $49,121 | Exceptional $64,089 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.1% | Exceptional 24.8% |
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 139.0%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 120.5%), and male poverty (22.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 115.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 53.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 56.3%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 58.7%).
| Poverty Metric | Tohono O'odham | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
| Poverty | Tragic 24.4% | Excellent 11.7% |
| Families | Tragic 20.4% | Excellent 8.5% |
| Males | Tragic 22.9% | Excellent 10.6% |
| Females | Tragic 25.9% | Excellent 12.7% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 24.7% | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Children Under 5 years | Tragic 29.5% | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Children Under 16 years | Tragic 31.7% | Excellent 15.2% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Single Males | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Single Females | Tragic 34.2% | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Single Fathers | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Single Mothers | Tragic 43.0% | Exceptional 27.1% |
| Married Couples | Tragic 11.2% | Good 5.1% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 20.8% | Good 10.8% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.1% | Average 12.2% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.5% | Excellent 11.1% |
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 95.8%), male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 89.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 82.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.78%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 18.7%).
| Unemployment Metric | Tohono O'odham | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
| Unemployment | Tragic 8.9% | Fair 5.3% |
| Males | Tragic 10.2% | Fair 5.4% |
| Females | Tragic 7.7% | Fair 5.4% |
| Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Average 11.6% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 22.1% | Exceptional 17.1% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.5% | Excellent 10.1% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 12.1% | Average 6.7% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.8% | Good 5.4% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.4% | Average 4.7% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.3% | Good 4.5% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 9.3% | Good 4.8% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Poor 4.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.0% | Excellent 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.1% | Good 5.1% |
| Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.8% | Excellent 8.5% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.9% | Good 5.4% |
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 9.5%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Tohono O'odham | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.2% | Exceptional 65.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 70.4% | Excellent 79.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.3% | Poor 35.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 68.6% | Average 75.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 77.5% | Poor 84.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 77.7% | Average 84.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.1% | Fair 84.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 75.1% | Average 82.8% |
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 64.2%), single father households (3.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 58.7%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.1% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 0.50%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and average family size (3.53 compared to 3.36, a difference of 5.2%).
| Family Structure Metric | Tohono O'odham | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
| Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 67.5% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Exceptional 29.1% |
| Married-couple Households | Tragic 37.9% | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.53 | Exceptional 3.36 |
| Single Father Households | Tragic 3.8% | Poor 2.4% |
| Single Mother Households | Tragic 9.1% | Average 6.3% |
| Currently Married | Tragic 36.8% | Good 47.1% |
| Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 49.8% | Excellent 30.4% |
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 81.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 8.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 19.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 22.5%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 8.6% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.7% | Exceptional 91.4% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 50.0% | Exceptional 59.6% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.9% | Exceptional 23.1% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 50.8%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 43.9%), and associate's degree (31.8% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (94.5% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.31%), 7th grade (95.0% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and 6th grade (96.5% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.63%).
| Education Level Metric | Tohono O'odham | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |
| Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Tragic 97.1% |
| Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Tragic 97.1% |
| 1st Grade | Fair 97.8% | Tragic 97.1% |
| 2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Tragic 97.0% |
| 3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Tragic 96.8% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 96.5% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 96.3% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Tragic 95.9% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Tragic 94.5% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Tragic 94.2% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Tragic 93.3% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 90.1% | Tragic 92.1% |
| 11th Grade | Tragic 87.6% | Tragic 90.9% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.7% | Tragic 89.6% |
| High School Diploma | Tragic 82.1% | Tragic 87.2% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 77.5% | Tragic 84.1% |
| College, Under 1 year | Tragic 52.8% | Fair 64.5% |
| College, 1 year or more | Tragic 47.1% | Fair 58.5% |
| Associate's Degree | Tragic 31.8% | Fair 45.2% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 24.4% | Fair 36.8% |
| Master's Degree | Tragic 9.7% | Poor 14.0% |
| Professional Degree | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 4.0% |
| Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Poor 1.7% |
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 90.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 58.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 54.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 13.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.2%), and disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 16.5%).
| Disability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
| Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Males | Tragic 14.6% | Excellent 10.9% |
| Females | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 36.0% | Average 23.3% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.7% | Tragic 48.7% |
| Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Excellent 2.1% |
| Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Good 3.0% |
| Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Excellent 17.0% |
| Ambulatory | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Self-Care | Tragic 3.1% | Poor 2.5% |