Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Immigrants from South Eastern Asia

Poor
Good
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,462
SOCIAL INDEX
62.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
152nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,090,896 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.082. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 10.1 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.
Ecuadorian Integration in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Communities

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $64,089, a difference of 16.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $106,109, a difference of 13.2%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $106,252, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $55,714, a difference of 3.3%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $40,558, a difference of 3.7%), and per capita income ($41,958 compared to $43,539, a difference of 3.8%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Income
Income MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from South Eastern Asia
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Average
$43,539
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Excellent
$106,252
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Exceptional
$91,541
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Excellent
$47,671
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Good
$55,241
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Excellent
$40,558
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Exceptional
$55,714
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Exceptional
$100,283
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Exceptional
$106,109
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Exceptional
$64,089
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Exceptional
24.8%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 34.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 29.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 7.5%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.0%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from South Eastern Asia
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Excellent
10.6%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Excellent
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
17.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
12.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
15.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Excellent
15.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Exceptional
27.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Average
12.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Excellent
11.1%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.69%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.2%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from South Eastern Asia
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Fair
5.4%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Good
5.4%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.66%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.35%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from South Eastern Asia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Excellent
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Poor
35.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Average
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Average
82.8%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.3%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 11.4%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.97%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.36, a difference of 1.2%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.9%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from South Eastern Asia
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
67.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Exceptional
29.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Exceptional
3.36
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Excellent
30.4%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 164.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 84.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 64.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 17.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 42.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 64.3%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from South Eastern Asia
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Exceptional
59.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
23.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
8.2%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 17.9%), college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and college, 1 year or more (54.3% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.070%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.070%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from South Eastern Asia
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
96.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Tragic
96.5%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Tragic
96.3%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Tragic
95.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Tragic
94.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Tragic
93.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Tragic
92.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Tragic
90.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Tragic
89.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Tragic
87.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
84.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Fair
64.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Fair
58.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Fair
45.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Fair
36.8%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.7%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 17.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from South Eastern Asia
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Average
23.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Good
3.0%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Poor
2.5%