Russian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 478,320,392 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.657. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.306% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to an increase of 306.1 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,154 compared to $43,539, a difference of 22.1%), median male earnings ($63,939 compared to $55,241, a difference of 15.7%), and median family income ($120,487 compared to $106,252, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $55,714, a difference of 2.4%), householder income over 65 years ($67,626 compared to $64,089, a difference of 5.5%), and median household income ($98,008 compared to $91,541, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.8%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 14.9%), and single father poverty (16.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.71%), single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.71%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.4%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.1%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.2%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.50%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 37.6%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 34.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 73.6%), professional degree (6.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 57.0%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 19.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 10.3%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), female disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.80%), and disability (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.3%).