Belizean vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,222,053 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Belizean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.332. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Belizeans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.482% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Belizeans corresponds to a decrease of 482.1 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,684 compared to $106,109, a difference of 19.7%), median household income ($77,028 compared to $91,541, a difference of 18.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,534 compared to $100,283, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,429 compared to $40,558, a difference of 8.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,094 compared to $55,714, a difference of 9.0%), and per capita income ($39,097 compared to $43,539, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 33.9%), family poverty (11.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 31.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 12.9%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and single mother poverty (31.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 26.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.8% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 22.0%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.0%), and married-couple households (42.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.39 compared to 3.36, a difference of 0.85%), family households (64.8% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 66.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 30.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 6.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.0% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 23.4%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 13.1%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 13.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.8% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (49.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.0%).