Lumbee vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,347,335 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.434. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to a decrease of 8.6 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($54,644 compared to $91,541, a difference of 67.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $100,283, a difference of 66.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($65,113 compared to $106,109, a difference of 63.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 16.3%), median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $40,558, a difference of 24.8%), and median earnings ($36,876 compared to $47,671, a difference of 29.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (25.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 119.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (33.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 112.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (26.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 110.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 59.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 61.2%), and married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 64.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 92.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 69.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 14.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.6% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 58.8%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 44.5%), and married-couple households (39.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.36, a difference of 1.1%), family households (63.1% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 20.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 0.24%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 91.3%), professional degree (2.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 63.8%), and doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.7% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.35%), 9th grade (94.4% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (17.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 67.0%), ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 61.7%), and vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 60.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 12.3%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 15.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 17.5%).