Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,056,682 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.265. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puget Sound Salish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puget Sound Salish corresponds to an increase of 3.1 Immigrants from Guatemala.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($53,704 compared to $46,244, a difference of 16.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,661 compared to $81,341, a difference of 15.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,340 compared to $86,573, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,543 compared to $51,447, a difference of 8.0%), per capita income ($41,495 compared to $37,550, a difference of 10.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,934 compared to $53,950, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 47.4%), family poverty (8.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 42.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 7.8%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 25.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.9%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 23.6%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 23.2%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.86%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.41, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 37.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 33.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 16.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 99.1%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 15.6%), and college, under 1 year (63.9% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (30.7% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 41.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 32.3%), and disability age under 5 (0.97% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.8%).