Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,377,605 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.266. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to a decrease of 10.2 Immigrants from Guatemala.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $53,950, a difference of 20.6%), median family income ($78,249 compared to $87,191, a difference of 11.4%), and median household income ($68,461 compared to $75,123, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 0.44%), householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $51,447, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,701 compared to $81,341, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 42.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 32.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and female poverty (16.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 29.2%), and male unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 25.1%), single father households (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 12.4%), and births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 2.4%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and married-couple households (44.2% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 28.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 26.8%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 18.0%), and master's degree (10.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (50.7% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.74%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 20.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.4%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.42%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.6%).