Scottish vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 373,015,675 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.007. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Immigrants from Guatemala.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 29.8%), median male earnings ($55,793 compared to $46,244, a difference of 20.6%), and median family income ($104,288 compared to $87,191, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $51,447, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $35,444, a difference of 8.3%), and median household income ($85,101 compared to $75,123, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 68.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 50.6%), and family poverty (7.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.050%), single male poverty (14.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.0%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 19.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 34.4%), single father households (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 30.3%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.86%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 65.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 5.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 153.0%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 42.7%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.3%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 34.5%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 34.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.6%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.9%).