Immigrants from Fiji vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,744,642 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.412. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.124% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to a decrease of 124.4 Immigrants from Guatemala.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,954 compared to $81,341, a difference of 27.8%), median household income ($93,933 compared to $75,123, a difference of 25.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,952 compared to $86,573, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 0.21%), householder income under 25 years ($57,074 compared to $51,447, a difference of 10.9%), and per capita income ($42,694 compared to $37,550, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 45.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 37.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 18.2%), receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 20.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 29.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.98%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.6% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 28.5%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.2%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.45 compared to 3.41, a difference of 1.3%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and family households (68.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 42.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 41.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 16.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 32.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in college, under 1 year (63.4% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 12.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 12.4%), and college, 1 year or more (56.9% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (96.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and kindergarten (96.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 33.5%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), male disability (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.79%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.1%).