Arapaho vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,379,123 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.881. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.555% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 555.0 Immigrants from Guatemala.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $51,447, a difference of 16.9%), per capita income ($32,345 compared to $37,550, a difference of 16.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $86,573, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 4.5%), median family income ($82,064 compared to $87,191, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $53,950, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 59.4%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 44.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 0.39%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 0.55%), and female poverty (17.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 120.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 114.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 113.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (74.4% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 25.7%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 21.6%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.2%), married-couple households (41.8% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 52.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 37.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 34.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 69.9%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 19.8%), and doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.2%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 48.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 29.6%), and male disability (13.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 1.4%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.9%).