Central American vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,412,441 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Central American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.721. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central Americans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.302% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central Americans corresponds to an increase of 301.7 Immigrants from Guatemala.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $86,573, a difference of 5.1%), median household income ($78,803 compared to $75,123, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,144 compared to $81,341, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,626 compared to $51,447, a difference of 2.3%), per capita income ($38,560 compared to $37,550, a difference of 2.7%), and wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 8.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 2.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 0.78%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.65%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 4.8%), married-couple households (43.9% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.41 compared to 3.41, a difference of 0.10%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.42%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 5.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and master's degree (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.18%), 1st grade (96.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (96.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.9%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.48%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 0.62%).