Hispanic or Latino vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 376,870,699 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.431. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hispanics or Latinos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hispanics or Latinos corresponds to an increase of 7.9 Immigrants from Guatemala.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 10.8%), per capita income ($35,688 compared to $37,550, a difference of 5.2%), and median female earnings ($34,421 compared to $35,444, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,419 compared to $46,244, a difference of 0.38%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,006 compared to $86,573, a difference of 0.66%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,515 compared to $81,341, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 8.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.0%), single mother poverty (33.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 0.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.4% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 6.1%), married-couple households (45.4% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and family households with children (29.9% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.41 compared to 3.41, a difference of 0.080%), births to unmarried women (37.8% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 0.77%), and divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 23.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 13.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 17.8%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and master's degree (10.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.58%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 11.8%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.90%), female disability (12.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 3.0%).