Swiss vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 329,015,564 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.605. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.639% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to an increase of 639.2 Immigrants from Guatemala.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (30.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 33.5%), median male earnings ($55,731 compared to $46,244, a difference of 20.5%), and median family income ($104,396 compared to $87,191, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,493 compared to $51,447, a difference of 0.090%), median female earnings ($37,904 compared to $35,444, a difference of 6.9%), and median earnings ($46,315 compared to $40,851, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 67.8%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 55.0%), and receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.11%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and single father poverty (17.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 33.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 29.2%), and unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 37.3%), single father households (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 30.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.27%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 42.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 16.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 134.1%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 42.0%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.2%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 33.3%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.15%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.3%).