Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,263,474 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.624. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.389% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to an increase of 388.9 Immigrants from Guatemala.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,044 compared to $37,550, a difference of 38.6%), median male earnings ($63,326 compared to $46,244, a difference of 36.9%), and median family income ($116,942 compared to $87,191, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $51,447, a difference of 8.6%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 17.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $53,950, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 49.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 49.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 7.3%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 29.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.5%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 52.9%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 40.6%), and births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.9%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 35.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 28.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 81.4%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 75.4%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 75.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 18.9%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.9%).