Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Micronesia
Immigrants from Guatemala
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Micronesia
Immigrants from Guatemala
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,504
SOCIAL INDEX
12.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
304th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala Integration in Immigrants from Micronesia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,421,185 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.597. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.165% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 165.1 Immigrants from Guatemala.
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Guatemala Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $53,950, a difference of 13.1%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 8.9%), and median family income ($90,345 compared to $87,191, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,477 compared to $35,444, a difference of 0.090%), per capita income ($37,464 compared to $37,550, a difference of 0.23%), and median household income ($75,574 compared to $75,123, a difference of 0.60%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Guatemala |
| Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,464 | Tragic $37,550 |
| Median Family Income | Tragic $90,345 | Tragic $87,191 |
| Median Household Income | Tragic $75,574 | Tragic $75,123 |
| Median Earnings | Tragic $41,133 | Tragic $40,851 |
| Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,177 | Tragic $46,244 |
| Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,477 | Tragic $35,444 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,691 | Poor $51,447 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,544 | Tragic $81,341 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,864 | Tragic $86,573 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,000 | Tragic $53,950 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.4% | Exceptional 22.5% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Guatemala Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 32.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 31.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 1.0%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and single female poverty (23.0% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 4.7%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Guatemala |
| Poverty | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 15.5% |
| Families | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 12.0% |
| Males | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
| Females | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 17.0% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 20.9% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 16.6% |
| Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.4% | Tragic 22.0% |
| Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 21.6% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 21.6% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 21.9% |
| Single Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.8% |
| Single Females | Tragic 23.0% | Tragic 24.1% |
| Single Fathers | Tragic 18.6% | Poor 16.6% |
| Single Mothers | Tragic 31.6% | Tragic 33.3% |
| Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Tragic 7.2% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 13.8% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 15.1% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Guatemala Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.9%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.27%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Guatemala |
| Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
| Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
| Females | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
| Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Tragic 18.7% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Poor 10.5% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 7.2% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.0% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.2% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 4.9% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.3% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
| Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
| Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Good 8.7% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 8.6% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Average 8.9% | Tragic 9.4% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Tragic 6.4% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Guatemala Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Guatemala |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Exceptional 65.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.9% | Tragic 78.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.2% | Tragic 35.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.8% | Good 75.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.0% | Tragic 83.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Tragic 83.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.1% | Tragic 82.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.1% | Tragic 81.1% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Guatemala Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 16.6%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.41, a difference of 2.7%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.0%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Guatemala |
| Family Households | Average 64.2% | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Family Households with Children | Fair 27.2% | Exceptional 28.8% |
| Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.9% | Tragic 42.8% |
| Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Exceptional 3.41 |
| Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.0% |
| Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 7.7% |
| Currently Married | Tragic 45.6% | Tragic 42.6% |
| Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Fair 12.2% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 32.9% | Tragic 37.5% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Guatemala Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.9%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 5.1%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Guatemala |
| No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Tragic 11.2% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Tragic 88.9% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 55.1% | Tragic 53.5% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.7% | Good 19.7% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Guatemala Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 71.0%), college, under 1 year (61.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 9.5%), and high school diploma (88.6% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 1.2%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Guatemala |
| No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Tragic 3.6% |
| Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Tragic 96.4% |
| Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Tragic 96.4% |
| 1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Tragic 96.4% |
| 2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Tragic 96.2% |
| 3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Tragic 95.8% |
| 4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Tragic 95.1% |
| 5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Tragic 94.6% |
| 6th Grade | Average 97.0% | Tragic 93.9% |
| 7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Tragic 91.3% |
| 8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Tragic 90.7% |
| 9th Grade | Fair 94.7% | Tragic 89.4% |
| 10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Tragic 87.4% |
| 11th Grade | Poor 92.2% | Tragic 85.8% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Poor 90.6% | Tragic 84.0% |
| High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Tragic 81.4% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.7% | Tragic 77.9% |
| College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.5% | Tragic 56.2% |
| College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.8% | Tragic 50.7% |
| Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.2% | Tragic 38.1% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 30.8% |
| Master's Degree | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 11.6% |
| Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.4% |
| Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.4% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Guatemala Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 30.5%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 21.8%), and male disability (12.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.38%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Guatemala |
| Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Good 11.6% |
| Males | Tragic 12.9% | Good 11.0% |
| Females | Tragic 13.5% | Good 12.1% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Good 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Excellent 5.5% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.9% | Poor 11.6% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.1% | Tragic 25.7% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.1% | Tragic 49.1% |
| Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.4% |
| Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 17.7% |
| Ambulatory | Tragic 7.0% | Fair 6.2% |
| Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |