Pima vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,182,486 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 8.1 Immigrants from Guatemala.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $37,550, a difference of 22.5%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $75,123, a difference of 18.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $86,573, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $51,447, a difference of 0.11%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $35,444, a difference of 0.33%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $81,341, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 58.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 58.6%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 53.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 12.5%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 15.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (27.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 128.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 101.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 83.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 14.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 39.6%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 37.3%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.4%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 26.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 2.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 69.1%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 32.5%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (81.6% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 0.31%), 12th grade, no diploma (84.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.70%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 50.3%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 40.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 5.9%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.9%).