Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Guatemala
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Immigrants from Guatemala

Tragic
Poor
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,504
SOCIAL INDEX
12.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
304th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Guatemala Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,043,748 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.863. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.201% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 201.2 Immigrants from Guatemala.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Immigrants from Guatemala Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Guatemala Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $37,550, a difference of 24.1%), median household income ($61,663 compared to $75,123, a difference of 21.8%), and median family income ($72,193 compared to $87,191, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $35,444, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $53,950, a difference of 9.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Guatemala Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Guatemala
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Tragic
$37,550
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Tragic
$87,191
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Tragic
$75,123
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Tragic
$40,851
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Tragic
$46,244
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Tragic
$35,444
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Poor
$51,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Tragic
$81,341
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Tragic
$86,573
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Tragic
$53,950
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
22.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Guatemala Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 70.6%), male poverty (22.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 63.3%), and poverty (24.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 27.1%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 29.2%), and single father poverty (22.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 32.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Guatemala Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Guatemala
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
15.5%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
14.0%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Tragic
16.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Tragic
21.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Tragic
24.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
33.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
7.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
13.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
15.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
14.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Guatemala Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 80.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 76.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 68.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Guatemala Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Guatemala
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Good
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
8.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
6.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Guatemala Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 12.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 7.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Guatemala Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Guatemala
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
35.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Tragic
81.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Guatemala Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 33.0%), single father households (3.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 27.8%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (67.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Guatemala Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Guatemala
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
28.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Tragic
42.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Exceptional
3.41
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Tragic
42.6%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Fair
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Tragic
37.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Guatemala Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 39.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 4.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Guatemala Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Guatemala
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
11.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
88.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Tragic
53.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
6.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Guatemala Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 54.7%), bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 26.0%), and professional degree (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (77.5% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 0.54%), 12th grade, no diploma (84.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.83%), and high school diploma (82.1% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 0.84%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Guatemala Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Guatemala
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
3.6%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
96.4%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
96.4%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
96.4%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
96.2%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Tragic
95.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
95.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
94.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
93.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Tragic
91.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
90.7%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Tragic
89.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Tragic
87.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Tragic
85.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
84.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
81.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
77.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Tragic
56.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Tragic
50.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Tragic
38.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
30.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
11.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.4%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Guatemala Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 78.6%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 49.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 8.6%), disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Guatemala Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Guatemala
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Poor
11.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Tragic
49.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
17.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.6%