Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Immigrants from Guatemala
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Immigrants from Guatemala
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,504
SOCIAL INDEX
12.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
304th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 248,527,760 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.069. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 10.8 Immigrants from Guatemala.
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Guatemala Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($106,453 compared to $87,191, a difference of 22.1%), median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $46,244, a difference of 20.5%), and per capita income ($45,220 compared to $37,550, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $51,447, a difference of 4.3%), median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $35,444, a difference of 13.7%), and wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 14.2%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Guatemala |
| Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,220 | Tragic $37,550 |
| Median Family Income | Excellent $106,453 | Tragic $87,191 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,100 | Tragic $75,123 |
| Median Earnings | Excellent $47,617 | Tragic $40,851 |
| Median Male Earnings | Good $55,712 | Tragic $46,244 |
| Median Female Earnings | Good $40,297 | Tragic $35,444 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,680 | Poor $51,447 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,623 | Tragic $81,341 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,705 | Tragic $86,573 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,416 | Tragic $53,950 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.6% | Exceptional 22.5% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Guatemala Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 43.2%), family poverty (8.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 36.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.9% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 5.7%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and single male poverty (12.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 10.9%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Guatemala |
| Poverty | Average 12.3% | Tragic 15.5% |
| Families | Good 8.7% | Tragic 12.0% |
| Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
| Females | Average 13.3% | Tragic 17.0% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Tragic 20.9% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Tragic 16.6% |
| Children Under 5 years | Good 16.9% | Tragic 22.0% |
| Children Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 21.6% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Tragic 21.6% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.1% | Tragic 21.9% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
| Single Females | Good 20.7% | Tragic 24.1% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Poor 16.6% |
| Single Mothers | Good 28.7% | Tragic 33.3% |
| Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 15.1% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.4% | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Guatemala Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.4%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Guatemala |
| Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
| Males | Average 5.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
| Females | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
| Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Tragic 18.7% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Poor 10.5% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 7.2% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Tragic 5.2% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.3% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.3% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
| Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
| Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Good 8.7% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Tragic 8.6% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 9.4% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 6.4% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Guatemala Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.68%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Guatemala |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Exceptional 65.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 78.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.9% | Tragic 35.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Good 75.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 83.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Tragic 83.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.9% | Tragic 82.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.1% | Tragic 81.1% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Guatemala Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 23.1%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 22.6%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.22%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Guatemala |
| Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Exceptional 28.8% |
| Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Tragic 42.8% |
| Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.29 | Exceptional 3.41 |
| Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 3.0% |
| Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Tragic 7.7% |
| Currently Married | Average 46.5% | Tragic 42.6% |
| Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Fair 12.2% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.6% | Tragic 37.5% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Guatemala Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 14.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 10.5%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Guatemala |
| No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Tragic 11.2% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Tragic 88.9% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.5% | Tragic 53.5% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.8% | Good 19.7% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Guatemala Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 59.4%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 37.5%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Guatemala |
| No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Tragic 3.6% |
| Nursery School | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 96.4% |
| Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 96.4% |
| 1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 96.4% |
| 2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Tragic 96.2% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 95.8% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 95.1% |
| 5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Tragic 94.6% |
| 6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Tragic 93.9% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Tragic 91.3% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 90.7% |
| 9th Grade | Poor 94.5% | Tragic 89.4% |
| 10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Tragic 87.4% |
| 11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Tragic 85.8% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Tragic 84.0% |
| High School Diploma | Fair 88.8% | Tragic 81.4% |
| GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.5% | Tragic 77.9% |
| College, Under 1 year | Average 65.6% | Tragic 56.2% |
| College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Tragic 50.7% |
| Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Tragic 38.1% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.3% | Tragic 30.8% |
| Master's Degree | Fair 14.7% | Tragic 11.6% |
| Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Tragic 3.4% |
| Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.4% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Guatemala Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.2%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.87%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Guatemala |
| Disability | Fair 11.8% | Good 11.6% |
| Males | Fair 11.4% | Good 11.0% |
| Females | Good 12.1% | Good 12.1% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Good 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Excellent 5.5% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Poor 11.6% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.0% | Tragic 25.7% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.0% | Tragic 49.1% |
| Vision | Average 2.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
| Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 17.7% |
| Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Fair 6.2% |
| Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |