Hmong vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison
COMPARE
Hmong
Immigrants from Guatemala
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Hmong
Immigrants from Guatemala
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,504
SOCIAL INDEX
12.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
304th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala Integration in Hmong Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,702,886 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.041. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.067% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 66.6 Immigrants from Guatemala.
Hmong vs Immigrants from Guatemala Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 23.3%), median family income ($91,296 compared to $87,191, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $53,950, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $35,444, a difference of 0.15%), median household income ($75,839 compared to $75,123, a difference of 0.95%), and per capita income ($38,120 compared to $37,550, a difference of 1.5%).
Income Metric | Hmong | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,120 | Tragic $37,550 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,296 | Tragic $87,191 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,839 | Tragic $75,123 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,111 | Tragic $40,851 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,254 | Tragic $46,244 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,498 | Tragic $35,444 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,364 | Poor $51,447 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,258 | Tragic $81,341 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,115 | Tragic $86,573 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,339 | Tragic $53,950 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Exceptional 22.5% |
Hmong vs Immigrants from Guatemala Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 44.5%), receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 34.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (14.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 3.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and single female poverty (23.1% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 4.5%).
Poverty Metric | Hmong | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Tragic 15.5% |
Families | Average 9.1% | Tragic 12.0% |
Males | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 14.0% |
Females | Fair 13.9% | Tragic 17.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.0% | Tragic 20.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.9% | Tragic 16.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Tragic 21.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 16.6% | Tragic 21.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.5% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 24.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.2% | Tragic 33.3% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Tragic 15.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 14.6% |
Hmong vs Immigrants from Guatemala Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 58.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 41.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Hmong | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Poor 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.7% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 13.7% | Good 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 8.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.4% |
Hmong vs Immigrants from Guatemala Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 0.73%).
Labor Participation Metric | Hmong | Immigrants from Guatemala |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.9% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Tragic 35.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.7% | Tragic 81.1% |
Hmong vs Immigrants from Guatemala Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 35.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 26.3%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.27%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 0.77%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.98%).
Family Structure Metric | Hmong | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.6% | Exceptional 28.8% |
Married-couple Households | Good 47.0% | Tragic 42.8% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Exceptional 3.41 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.4% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Tragic 42.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Fair 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 37.5% |
Hmong vs Immigrants from Guatemala Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 8.1%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.86%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 6.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Hmong | Immigrants from Guatemala |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Tragic 11.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Tragic 88.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Tragic 53.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Good 19.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Hmong vs Immigrants from Guatemala Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 83.6%), master's degree (13.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.2%), and associate's degree (43.4% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.7%).
Education Level Metric | Hmong | Immigrants from Guatemala |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Tragic 3.6% |
Nursery School | Good 98.1% | Tragic 96.4% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.1% | Tragic 96.4% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Tragic 96.4% |
2nd Grade | Good 98.0% | Tragic 96.2% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Tragic 95.8% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Tragic 95.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 94.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 93.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 91.3% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.1% | Tragic 90.7% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.2% | Tragic 89.4% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 87.4% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Tragic 85.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.3% | Tragic 84.0% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Tragic 81.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 84.9% | Tragic 77.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.5% | Tragic 56.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.2% | Tragic 50.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.4% | Tragic 38.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 30.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 11.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.4% |
Hmong vs Immigrants from Guatemala Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.9%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 23.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.4%).
Disability Metric | Hmong | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 12.5% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 13.1% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.1% | Poor 11.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 25.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Tragic 49.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 17.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |