Immigrants from India vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 330,998,628 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Immigrant from India communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.497. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from India within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from India corresponds to a decrease of 11.1 Immigrants from Guatemala.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($74,207 compared to $46,244, a difference of 60.5%), median family income ($134,028 compared to $87,191, a difference of 53.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($132,488 compared to $86,573, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($59,914 compared to $51,447, a difference of 16.5%), householder income over 65 years ($72,804 compared to $53,950, a difference of 34.9%), and median female earnings ($48,292 compared to $35,444, a difference of 36.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (10.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 100.6%), receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 98.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (10.9% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 98.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 18.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 27.0%), and single male poverty (10.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 33.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 41.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (3.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 37.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.7% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.3% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.4% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (22.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 63.7%), single father households (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 57.7%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.7%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.41, a difference of 6.3%), and family households with children (31.0% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 36.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 10.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 107.0%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 103.8%), and master's degree (22.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 91.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 40.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 40.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (19.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.2% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 8.7%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 11.5%).