Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,402,784 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.629. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.335% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 335.1 Immigrants from Guatemala.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $46,244, a difference of 6.4%), wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and median family income ($92,239 compared to $87,191, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($37,857 compared to $37,550, a difference of 0.82%), householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $51,447, a difference of 2.8%), and median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $35,444, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 26.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 25.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 1.0%), single female poverty (22.9% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.1%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.4%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 10.2%), currently married (45.0% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and married-couple households (45.1% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.41%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.89%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 36.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 13.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 13.6%), college, under 1 year (61.3% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and college, 1 year or more (54.7% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.8%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 0.18%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.70%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.5%).