Menominee vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,412,479 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Menominee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.778. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Menominee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.412% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Menominee corresponds to a decrease of 411.5 Immigrants from Guatemala.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Menominee and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($76,903 compared to $86,573, a difference of 12.6%), median household income ($68,423 compared to $75,123, a difference of 9.8%), and median family income ($79,563 compared to $87,191, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,358 compared to $81,341, a difference of 2.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,719 compared to $53,950, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Menominee and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 47.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 42.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (21.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.62%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and female poverty (17.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Menominee and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (10.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 99.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 57.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and male unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Menominee and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (68.7% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Menominee and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 40.9%), births to unmarried women (51.1% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 36.4%), and single mother households (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (42.3% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 0.84%), married-couple households (42.0% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (66.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Menominee and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 37.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 14.9%), and no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.63%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Menominee and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 84.4%), master's degree (10.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 14.1%), and bachelor's degree (27.3% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (50.6% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 0.26%), college, under 1 year (57.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Menominee and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 87.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 36.7%), and male disability (15.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and female disability (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.3%).