Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,131,992 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.267. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 16.8 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 25.3%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $44,204, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $72,178, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $34,317, a difference of 0.28%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $35,720, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $43,266, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 23.2%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 17.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 0.40%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.52%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (45.9% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 17.6%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.3%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 41.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 30.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 13.2%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 27.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 41.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.6%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.79%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 62.8%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 54.2%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 5.1%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.5%).