Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,625,537 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.370. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puget Sound Salish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.083% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puget Sound Salish corresponds to an increase of 83.1 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,661 compared to $72,178, a difference of 29.8%), householder income under 25 years ($55,543 compared to $43,266, a difference of 28.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,340 compared to $77,850, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,376 compared to $34,317, a difference of 14.7%), per capita income ($41,495 compared to $35,720, a difference of 16.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,934 compared to $51,393, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 49.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 47.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.5%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and single male poverty (12.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 48.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 29.8%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 21.5%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.42%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.77%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 78.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 55.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.57%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 33.0%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 32.6%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.9% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 0.60%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.66%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 36.0%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.2%).