Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Congo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Immigrants from Congo

Tragic
Fair
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Congo Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,269,213 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.932. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 34.6 Immigrants from Congo.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Congo Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $35,720, a difference of 18.1%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $82,216, a difference of 13.9%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $44,204, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $34,317, a difference of 3.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($69,068 compared to $72,178, a difference of 4.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Congo Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Congo
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Tragic
$35,720
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Tragic
$82,216
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Tragic
$66,768
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Tragic
$39,169
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Tragic
$44,204
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Tragic
$34,317
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Tragic
$43,266
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Tragic
$72,178
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Tragic
$77,850
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Tragic
$51,393
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
21.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Congo Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 82.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 77.8%), and family poverty (20.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 71.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (29.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 23.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 26.2%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 27.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Congo Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Congo
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
16.1%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
11.9%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
14.7%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
17.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
24.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Tragic
16.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Tragic
23.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Tragic
22.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
22.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
13.9%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Tragic
25.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
33.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Fair
12.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
14.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Congo Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 116.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 93.9%), and male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 92.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 18.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (10.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 20.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Congo Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Congo
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Average
5.3%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Average
5.3%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
8.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
6.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Congo Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 33.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 17.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 8.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Congo Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Congo
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
41.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Tragic
81.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Congo Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 51.2%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 35.5%), and family households (67.1% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.6%), married-couple households (37.9% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.53 compared to 3.23, a difference of 9.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Congo Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Congo
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
59.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Fair
27.3%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Tragic
39.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
8.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Tragic
41.1%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
13.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Tragic
36.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Congo Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 55.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 4.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 11.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Congo Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Congo
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Good
90.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Tragic
52.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Tragic
17.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
5.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Congo Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 37.6%), associate's degree (31.8% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 31.5%), and master's degree (9.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.060%), 5th grade (97.0% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and 3rd grade (97.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Congo Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Congo
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Tragic
92.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Tragic
90.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
89.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
87.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Tragic
61.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Tragic
41.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
33.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.6%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Congo Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 104.6%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 43.5%), and ambulatory disability (8.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Congo Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Congo
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
11.7%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Tragic
26.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
19.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Poor
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.4%