Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

COMPARE

Guatemalan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Congo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Guatemalans

Immigrants from Congo

Poor
Fair
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Congo Integration in Guatemalan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,310,092 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.243. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to an increase of 6.3 Immigrants from Congo.
Guatemalan Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities

Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Congo Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $43,266, a difference of 19.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,331 compared to $72,178, a difference of 14.1%), and median household income ($75,961 compared to $66,768, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $34,317, a difference of 4.0%), wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and median earnings ($41,205 compared to $39,169, a difference of 5.2%).
Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Congo Income
Income MetricGuatemalanImmigrants from Congo
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,766
Tragic
$35,720
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,295
Tragic
$82,216
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,961
Tragic
$66,768
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,205
Tragic
$39,169
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,736
Tragic
$44,204
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,695
Tragic
$34,317
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,525
Tragic
$43,266
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,331
Tragic
$72,178
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,705
Tragic
$77,850
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,526
Tragic
$51,393
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.6%
Exceptional
21.7%

Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Congo Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 18.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 18.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.76%), family poverty (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and receiving food stamps (14.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 1.9%).
Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Congo Poverty
Poverty MetricGuatemalanImmigrants from Congo
Poverty
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
16.1%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
11.9%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
14.7%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
17.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
24.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
16.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
23.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.2%
Tragic
22.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Tragic
22.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.4%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Males
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
13.9%
Single Females
Tragic
23.8%
Tragic
25.3%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.9%
Tragic
33.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.8%
Fair
12.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
14.1%

Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Congo Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 26.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.3%).
Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Congo Unemployment
Unemployment MetricGuatemalanImmigrants from Congo
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Average
5.3%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Average
5.3%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
8.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.0%

Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Congo Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 17.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.64%).
Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Congo Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricGuatemalanImmigrants from Congo
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.5%
Exceptional
41.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.7%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.2%
Tragic
81.6%

Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Congo Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.3%), married-couple households (43.3% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 0.89%), currently married (42.9% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and average family size (3.40 compared to 3.23, a difference of 5.4%).
Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Congo Family Structure
Family Structure MetricGuatemalanImmigrants from Congo
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Tragic
59.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.9%
Fair
27.3%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.3%
Tragic
39.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.40
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
8.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.9%
Tragic
41.1%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.2%
Tragic
13.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.1%
Tragic
36.8%

Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Congo Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 18.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.95%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.3%).
Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Congo Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricGuatemalanImmigrants from Congo
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Good
90.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Tragic
52.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Tragic
17.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
5.2%

Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Congo Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 44.8%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 12.9%), and associate's degree (38.5% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Congo Education Level
Education Level MetricGuatemalanImmigrants from Congo
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
89.9%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
87.9%
Tragic
92.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
86.4%
Tragic
90.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
89.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.0%
Tragic
87.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
78.5%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.8%
Tragic
61.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.2%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.5%
Tragic
41.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
33.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.6%

Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Congo Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 14.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.58%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.85%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Congo Disability
Disability MetricGuatemalanImmigrants from Congo
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
11.7%
Females
Good
12.1%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.5%
Tragic
26.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
19.7%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Poor
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%