Asian vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,829,213 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.281. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 1.4 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $72,178, a difference of 56.1%), median household income ($101,681 compared to $66,768, a difference of 52.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $77,850, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 24.2%), median female earnings ($44,586 compared to $34,317, a difference of 29.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $43,266, a difference of 31.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 71.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 67.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 66.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.9%), single father poverty (14.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 26.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 22.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 22.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 45.2%), births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 37.4%), and married-couple households (49.5% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.28 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (29.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and family households (66.5% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 33.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 22.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 9.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 52.4%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 51.2%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.030%), 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 41.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 28.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 3.8%).