Pima vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,814,905 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 3.1 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $43,266, a difference of 19.0%), per capita income ($30,644 compared to $35,720, a difference of 16.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $72,178, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $51,393, a difference of 1.7%), median earnings ($38,285 compared to $39,169, a difference of 2.3%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 91.4%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 85.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 69.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 4.2%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (27.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 147.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 108.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 95.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 15.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 36.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 39.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 22.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 16.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 65.2%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 39.9%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.23, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.77%), single mother households (8.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 49.9%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 40.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 0.20%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 29.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 44.7%), associate's degree (30.2% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 38.3%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.64%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 48.5%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 44.1%), and ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.72%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.9%).