Alsatian vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,294,983 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.179% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to an increase of 179.4 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,284 compared to $35,720, a difference of 32.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,059 compared to $72,178, a difference of 31.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,435 compared to $77,850, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 13.8%), householder income under 25 years ($49,267 compared to $43,266, a difference of 13.9%), and median female earnings ($40,060 compared to $34,317, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 25.3%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.8%), and family poverty (9.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.75%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 0.78%), and single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 40.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 26.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.82%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 31.4%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.8%), and married-couple households (44.8% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.9%), family households (61.7% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households with children (25.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 30.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 0.71%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 42.9%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 34.7%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.48%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.8% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 14.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 12.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.15%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and female disability (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.33%).