Immigrants from Latin America vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,969,872 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.017. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to an increase of 0.2 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $43,266, a difference of 18.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $72,178, a difference of 13.8%), and median household income ($75,420 compared to $66,768, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,307 compared to $34,317, a difference of 2.9%), per capita income ($36,823 compared to $35,720, a difference of 3.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,265 compared to $51,393, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 25.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 24.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.85%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and single mother poverty (32.4% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 33.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 28.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 23.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (44.7% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 14.4%), family households (67.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 13.5%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 0.98%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.42 compared to 3.23, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 36.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 21.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.19%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 37.6%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 22.3%), and master's degree (11.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.91%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 15.9%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 14.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.77%), disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.7%).