Scottish vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,701,788 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.044. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 34.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,123 compared to $77,850, a difference of 31.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,622 compared to $72,178, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $34,317, a difference of 11.9%), householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $43,266, a difference of 16.8%), and median earnings ($46,463 compared to $39,169, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 50.2%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 49.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (14.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.70%), single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 12.1%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 50.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 0.73%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 41.0%), married-couple households (49.0% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 25.6%), and currently married (49.2% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.98%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.23, a difference of 4.0%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 48.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 41.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 17.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 33.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 69.1%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 25.1%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 54.1%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.7%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.16%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.94%), and female disability (13.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.8%).