Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Immigrants from Congo
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Immigrants from Congo
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Congo Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 77,744,445 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.289. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.038% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 37.9 Immigrants from Congo.
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Congo Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,623 compared to $72,178, a difference of 35.2%), median household income ($89,100 compared to $66,768, a difference of 33.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $77,850, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $34,317, a difference of 17.4%), wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 18.2%), and median earnings ($47,617 compared to $39,169, a difference of 21.6%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Congo |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,220 | Tragic $35,720 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,453 | Tragic $82,216 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,100 | Tragic $66,768 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,617 | Tragic $39,169 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,712 | Tragic $44,204 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,297 | Tragic $34,317 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,680 | Tragic $43,266 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,623 | Tragic $72,178 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,705 | Tragic $77,850 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,416 | Tragic $51,393 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.6% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Congo Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (15.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 41.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 41.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.35%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and single male poverty (12.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 11.8%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Congo |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Tragic 16.1% |
Families | Good 8.7% | Tragic 11.9% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 14.7% |
Females | Average 13.3% | Tragic 17.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Tragic 24.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Tragic 16.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.9% | Tragic 23.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 22.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Tragic 22.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.1% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 13.9% |
Single Females | Good 20.7% | Tragic 25.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.7% | Tragic 33.8% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Tragic 11.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Fair 12.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.4% | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Congo Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 33.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.77%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.93%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Congo |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Average 5.3% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Average 5.3% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Tragic 8.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 6.0% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Congo Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.44%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Congo |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Exceptional 67.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.9% | Exceptional 41.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Fair 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.9% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.1% | Tragic 81.6% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Congo Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 29.2%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 20.3%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.9%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Congo |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Tragic 59.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Fair 27.3% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Tragic 39.0% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.29 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Tragic 8.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.5% | Tragic 41.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.6% | Tragic 36.8% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Congo Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 45.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 28.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.38%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 10.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Congo |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Good 10.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Good 90.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.5% | Tragic 52.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.8% | Tragic 17.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 5.2% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Congo Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 25.4%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 19.8%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.22%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Congo |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 97.3% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 94.9% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.5% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Tragic 92.4% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Tragic 90.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Tragic 89.0% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.8% | Tragic 87.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.5% | Tragic 83.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.6% | Tragic 61.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Tragic 55.6% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Tragic 41.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.3% | Tragic 33.6% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.7% | Tragic 12.6% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Tragic 3.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.6% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Congo Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 17.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.8%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.5%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and male disability (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.6%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Congo |
Disability | Fair 11.8% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 11.7% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.0% | Tragic 26.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.0% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Good 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 19.7% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Poor 6.2% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Exceptional 2.4% |