Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Congo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Immigrants from Congo

Poor
Fair
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Congo Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,505,596 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.348. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 15.6 Immigrants from Congo.
Ecuadorian Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Congo Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $72,178, a difference of 26.9%), householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $43,266, a difference of 24.6%), and median household income ($82,070 compared to $66,768, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 5.7%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $51,393, a difference of 6.9%), and median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $34,317, a difference of 14.0%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Congo Income
Income MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Congo
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Tragic
$35,720
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Tragic
$82,216
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Tragic
$66,768
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Tragic
$39,169
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Tragic
$44,204
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Tragic
$34,317
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Tragic
$43,266
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Tragic
$72,178
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Tragic
$77,850
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Tragic
$51,393
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Exceptional
21.7%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Congo Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 28.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 26.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 5.1%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 7.2%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Congo Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Congo
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
16.1%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
11.9%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
14.7%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
17.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
24.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
16.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
23.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
22.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
22.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
13.9%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Tragic
25.3%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Tragic
33.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Fair
12.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
14.1%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Congo Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 39.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 30.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 10.9%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Congo Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Congo
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Average
5.3%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Average
5.3%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Tragic
8.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.0%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Congo Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 32.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Congo Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Congo
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Exceptional
41.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
81.6%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Congo Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 14.6%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.9%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Congo Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Congo
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
59.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Fair
27.3%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Tragic
39.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
8.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Tragic
41.1%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Tragic
36.8%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Congo Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 126.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 24.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 15.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 20.8%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Congo Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Congo
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Good
90.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Tragic
52.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
17.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
5.2%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Congo Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.6%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.56%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.57%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Congo Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Congo
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Tragic
92.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Tragic
90.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Tragic
89.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Tragic
87.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Tragic
61.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
41.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Tragic
33.6%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Tragic
12.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.6%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Congo Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 24.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 22.6%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.6%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Congo Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Congo
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
11.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Tragic
26.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Tragic
19.7%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Poor
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%