Alaska Native vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,688,469 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to an increase of 14.6 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $43,266, a difference of 24.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,018 compared to $72,178, a difference of 22.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,991 compared to $77,850, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,558 compared to $35,720, a difference of 10.7%), median female earnings ($38,202 compared to $34,317, a difference of 11.3%), and median earnings ($43,750 compared to $39,169, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (16.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 33.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 31.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.11%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 117.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (7.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 84.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 67.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 38.6%), married-couple households (45.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 16.9%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (38.3% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 4.1%), average family size (3.37 compared to 3.23, a difference of 4.5%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 73.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 39.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 2.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 62.1%), bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and associate's degree (37.5% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 175.2%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 54.5%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.85%), female disability (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.97%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.6%).