Kiowa vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,871,739 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Kiowa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.734. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.304% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kiowa corresponds to an increase of 303.7 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 8.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,815 compared to $77,850, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,776 compared to $72,178, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($39,232 compared to $39,169, a difference of 0.16%), householder income over 65 years ($51,140 compared to $51,393, a difference of 0.49%), and median female earnings ($34,074 compared to $34,317, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (22.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 46.0%), single male poverty (18.3% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 31.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (29.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (22.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (24.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 55.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 50.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.1% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 17.2%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 13.7%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.19%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (61.4% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 44.9%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 18.2%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.85%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 49.4%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 40.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and disability age over 75 (54.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 11.3%).