Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ghanaian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Congo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ghanaians

Immigrants from Congo

Fair
Fair
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Congo Integration in Ghanaian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,689,872 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to an increase of 17.6 Immigrants from Congo.
Ghanaian Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Congo Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($83,582 compared to $66,768, a difference of 25.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,277 compared to $77,850, a difference of 25.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,137 compared to $72,178, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income over 65 years ($60,043 compared to $51,393, a difference of 16.8%), and median female earnings ($40,429 compared to $34,317, a difference of 17.8%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Congo Income
Income MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Congo
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,164
Tragic
$35,720
Median Family Income
Poor
$98,877
Tragic
$82,216
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,582
Tragic
$66,768
Median Earnings
Average
$46,440
Tragic
$39,169
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,810
Tragic
$44,204
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,429
Tragic
$34,317
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,594
Tragic
$43,266
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$90,137
Tragic
$72,178
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$97,277
Tragic
$77,850
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$60,043
Tragic
$51,393
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.3%
Exceptional
21.7%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Congo Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 24.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 23.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 1.4%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.2%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Congo Poverty
Poverty MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Congo
Poverty
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
16.1%
Families
Tragic
10.3%
Tragic
11.9%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
14.7%
Females
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
17.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
24.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
16.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
23.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
22.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
22.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Males
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
13.9%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Tragic
25.3%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.7%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.4%
Tragic
33.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Fair
12.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
14.1%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Congo Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 27.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 6.0%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Congo Unemployment
Unemployment MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Congo
Unemployment
Tragic
6.0%
Average
5.3%
Males
Tragic
6.1%
Average
5.3%
Females
Tragic
5.9%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
8.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.0%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Congo Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 17.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.99%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Congo Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Congo
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.3%
Exceptional
41.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.3%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
81.6%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Congo Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 11.5%), married-couple households (42.2% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.7%), single mother households (7.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 4.4%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Congo Family Structure
Family Structure MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Congo
Family Households
Tragic
63.5%
Tragic
59.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Fair
27.3%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.2%
Tragic
39.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
8.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.9%
Tragic
41.1%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.1%
Tragic
13.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.3%
Tragic
36.8%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Congo Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 63.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 7.6%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Congo Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Congo
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.4%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
83.6%
Good
90.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
48.0%
Tragic
52.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
17.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.2%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Congo Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 22.9%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 16.6%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.3% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.0%), 8th grade (94.9% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.0%), and 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.050%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Congo Education Level
Education Level MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Congo
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.8%
Tragic
92.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Tragic
90.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Tragic
89.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.7%
Tragic
87.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.3%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
63.9%
Tragic
61.7%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.4%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Tragic
41.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.0%
Tragic
33.6%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Tragic
12.6%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Tragic
1.6%

Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Congo Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 14.1%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 13.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.5%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.6%).
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Congo Disability
Disability MetricGhanaianImmigrants from Congo
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
11.7%
Females
Good
12.1%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.1%
Tragic
26.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.5%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
19.7%
Ambulatory
Good
6.0%
Poor
6.2%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.4%