Immigrants from Portugal vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,322,402 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to an increase of 1.6 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,512 compared to $72,178, a difference of 32.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,203 compared to $77,850, a difference of 27.4%), and median household income ($84,740 compared to $66,768, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $51,393, a difference of 8.8%), median female earnings ($39,788 compared to $34,317, a difference of 15.9%), and per capita income ($42,412 compared to $35,720, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 48.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 36.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.79%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 56.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 32.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (45.2% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 15.8%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.9%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.5%), and births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 16.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.7%), college, 1 year or more (51.9% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and college, under 1 year (57.7% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.080%), 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 67.9%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.2%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.6%).