Immigrants from Armenia vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,122,815 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Immigrant from Armenia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.846. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Armenia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.286% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Armenia corresponds to an increase of 285.5 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,867 compared to $72,178, a difference of 31.4%), median household income ($83,555 compared to $66,768, a difference of 25.1%), and per capita income ($44,552 compared to $35,720, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (20.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.6%), householder income over 65 years ($53,974 compared to $51,393, a difference of 5.0%), and median male earnings ($51,793 compared to $44,204, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 39.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 36.8%), and single female poverty (18.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.5%), receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 44.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 39.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.0% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 43.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.7% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 57.4%), births to unmarried women (26.1% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 41.2%), and divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.35 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.7%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and family households (63.5% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.65%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 40.0%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 24.4%), and bachelor's degree (39.4% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.98%), and nursery school (96.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 77.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 52.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.49%), disability (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 5.7%).