Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,850,343 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.293. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to a decrease of 26.5 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $72,178, a difference of 34.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $77,850, a difference of 32.8%), and median household income ($88,388 compared to $66,768, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $34,317, a difference of 17.6%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 18.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $43,266, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 45.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 43.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.040%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 20.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.96%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.97%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 19.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 29.8%), married-couple households (46.5% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.20%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (64.6% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 10.9%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 44.5%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 32.7%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.26%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 31.5%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 20.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.61%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 4.9%).